blog

HubSpot Lead Scoring: Why Your Current Approach is Probably Wrong (And How To Fix It)

Written by Ash Collyer | Jul 29, 2025 3:11:10 PM

 

You've probably got leads with scores of 400+ sitting in your CRM whilst your sales team chases prospects with scores of 20 who actually close deals. Sound familiar? 

At Forbidden, we've seen countless businesses make the same fundamental mistakes with HubSpot's lead scoring system. The good news? HubSpot's completely overhauled their approach in 2025, and frankly, it's about time. The bad news? If you're still using the old system after 31st August 2025, you're officially living in the past.  

This isn't your typical "how-to" guide filled with generic advice. We're going to tell you exactly what's wrong with traditional lead scoring, why HubSpot's new approach is a game-changer, and most importantly, how to implement a system that actually drives revenue for your business. 

 

Why Traditional Lead Scoring is Fundamentally Flawed

 

Here's an uncomfortable truth: 77% of companies using lead scoring see higher ROI, yet 34% of salespeople still say lead qualification is their biggest challenge. That's not a coincidence – it's a symptom of broken systems. 

The traditional approach treats all leads like they're cut from the same cloth. A marketing manager downloading your whitepaper gets the same treatment as a CEO requesting a demo. Your system assigns arbitrary points based on outdated assumptions, and before you know it, you're drowning in false positives whilst genuine opportunities slip through the cracks.  

 

The Three Cardinal Sins of Lead Scoring

 

#1 The One-Size-Fits-All Fallacy


Most businesses use the same scoring model for SME prospects and enterprise accounts. This is like using the same sales pitch for a corner shop and Tesco - it simply doesn't work.

#2 Treating Vanity Metrics as Intent Signals


Opening three emails doesn't equal buying intent. Yet countless businesses weight these low-value actions as they're meaningful indicators of purchase readiness.

#3 Static Scoring in a Dynamic World


Your scoring model from 2022 is about as relevant as a fax machine. Buyer behaviour evolves, market conditions change, yet most businesses set their scoring criteria and forget about them.


HubSpot's Revolutionary New Approach: Fit vs Engagement

Fit Scores: Who They Are

This measures how closely a prospect matches your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP). Think company size, industry, revenue, job title – the demographic and firmographic data that determines whether they're actually a viable customer.  

Engagement Scores: What They're Doing



This tracks behavioural signals that indicate buying intent. Website visits, content downloads, email interactions – the actions that suggest they're actively considering a purchase.   

Why is this separation brilliant? Because it prevents the classic scenario where a highly engaged competitor (high engagement, terrible fit) gets prioritised over a perfect-fit prospect who's early in their research phase (low engagement, excellent fit). 


Beyond Basic Scoring


Most guides stop at explaining HubSpot's features. We're going to show you how to think strategically about lead scoring implementation. 


The Revenue Velocity Matrix


We've developed a framework that goes beyond HubSpot's standard approach. Instead of just looking at fit and engagement, we add a third dimension: 
Revenue Velocity. This considers: 

  • Deal Size Potential: Based on company size and industry benchmarks 
  • Sales Cycle Predictability: How quickly similar prospects typically close 
  • Competitive Landscape: How contested the opportunity is likely to be 

This creates a three-dimensional scoring model that prioritises leads not just on fit and engagement, but on their potential to generate revenue quickly.   


The Decay Dilemma: Getting Timing Right

 

One area where most businesses completely cock up their lead scoring is decay rates. HubSpot's new system allows you to automatically reduce scores over time, but here's the thing: most businesses get the timing completely wrong.   

The standard advice? Set decay at 60 days. That's fine if you're selling coffee machines, but utterly useless if you're in the enterprise software space where sales cycles stretch to 18 months. 

Our Approach: Set decay rates based on your actual sales cycle data, not generic best practices. If your average sales cycle is 9 months, don't start decaying scores until month 4. But here's the clever bit – use different decay rates for different types of engagement: 

  • High-intent actions (demo requests, pricing page visits): Slow decay (90+ days) 
  • Medium-intent actions (whitepaper downloads, webinar attendance): Standard decay (60 days) 
  • Low-intent actions (blog visits, email opens): Fast decay (30 days) 


Setting Up Your New HubSpot Lead Scoring System

 

Step 1: Audit Your Current Disaster


Before building anything new, you need to understand what's broken. Export your current lead scores and map them against actual sales outcomes. We guarantee you'll find prospects who scored 300+ but never bought, whilst some of your best customers had scores below 50. 

Step 2: Define Your ICP with Surgical Precision


Stop with the vague "mid-market technology companies" nonsense. Get specific:
 

  • Revenue bands: £2M-£20M (not "medium-sized") 
  • Employee count: 50-500 people 
  • Technology stack: Uses Salesforce, has dedicated marketing team 
  • Growth stage: Series A-C funded or profitable for 3+ years 

 

Step 3: Map Your Buyer's Journey

 

Different stakeholders behave differently. Your scoring should reflect this: 

  • Economic buyers (CEOs, CFOs): Rarely engage with content but when they do, it's high-intent 
  • Technical buyers (CTOs, IT Directors): Deep technical content engagement 
  • User buyers (End users): High product engagement, demo requests 


Step 4: Implement Start Automation

 
Here's where HubSpot's new system shines. You can now create workflows that: 

  • Route high-fit, low-engagement leads to marketing for nurturing 
  • Fast-track high-fit, high-engagement leads straight to your best reps 
  • Exclude obvious non-fits using list exclusions rather than negative scoring 

 

The Commercial Reality: What This Means for Your Business

 

UK Market Considerations 

The UK B2B landscape has specific nuances that generic lead scoring misses: 

  • GDPR compliance affects data collection and scoring criteria 
  • Regional variations in buying behaviour (London vs Manchester vs Edinburgh) 
  • Industry concentrations (FinTech in London, Manufacturing in the North) 
  • Economic cycles that affect purchasing timing  

The Automation Amplifier 

HubSpot's new lead scoring system integrates beautifully with their workflow engine. You can now: 

  • Trigger specific nurture sequences based on score thresholds 
  • Alert sales reps instantly when prospects hit your MQL threshold 
  • Automatically adjust messaging based on fit/engagement combinations 

 

Advanced Lead Scoring Tactics


The Competitor Intelligence Layer

Here's something most guides won't tell you: use intent data to identify when prospects are researching your competitors. Tools like Bombora or 6sense can feed this data into HubSpot, allowing you to boost scores when prospects are in active buying mode – even if they haven't engaged with your content yet. 

The Account-Based Scoring Matrix


For enterprise prospects, individual contact scoring isn't enough. HubSpot's new company scoring feature lets you aggregate scores across multiple stakeholders. But here's the advanced play: weight different roles differently. A CFO's engagement should count more than a marketing coordinator's, regardless of activity level. 
 

The Negative Space Strategy

 

Instead of using negative scoring (which HubSpot is phasing out), create exclusion lists for: 

  • Competitors and partners 
  • Students and job seekers 
  • Existing customers (unless you're scoring for upsell) 
  • Countries/regions you don't serve 

 

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them


The Attribution Trap


Don't over-complicate attribution. Yes, multi-touch attribution is sophisticated, but if you can't act on the data, it's pointless. Start with simple first-touch and last-touch models, then evolve.  

The Threshold Obsession


Spending weeks debating whether your MQL threshold should be 50 or 75 points is missing the forest for the trees. Pick a number, measure results, adjust accordingly. Perfection is the enemy of progress.  

The Set-and-Forget Syndrome


Your lead scoring model isn't a piece of software you install and ignore. Market conditions change, buyer behaviour evolves, your product offering develops. Review and adjust quarterly, not annually.  


Measuring Success: The Metrics That Matter

 

Forget vanity metrics like "leads scored" or "average score". Focus on: 

  • MQL to SQL conversion rate: Are your marketing qualified leads actually sales-ready? 
  • Sales velocity: How quickly do high-scoring leads progress through your pipeline? 
  • Revenue attribution: What percentage of closed deals came from high-scoring leads? 
  • False positive rate: How many high-scoring leads turn out to be time-wasters?   

 

The Future of Lead Scoring: What's Coming Next

 

HubSpot's roadmap includes AI-assisted scoring that goes beyond traditional machine learning. We're talking about models that can: 

  • Predict buying committee composition based on early engagement patterns 
  • Identify optimal timing for sales outreach based on digital body language 
  • Adapt scoring criteria automatically based on market conditions  

But here's our prediction: the businesses that succeed won't be those with the most sophisticated technology, but those that understand their customers deeply enough to configure that technology effectively. 

 

It's Time to Get Serious About Lead Scoring



Lead scoring isn't a "nice-to-have" marketing automation feature – it's a competitive necessity. With HubSpot's new system, you finally have the tools to build something that actually works. 

The question isn't whether you need lead scoring; it's whether you're brave enough to challenge your assumptions, sophisticated enough to implement it properly, and committed enough to continuously improve it. 

The new HubSpot lead scoring system launches properly in 2025, and the old system stops updating on 31st August 2025. That gives you a narrow window to migrate and optimise. Use it wisely. 

Ready to revolutionise your lead scoring approach? The tools are there, the methodology is proven, and the opportunity is massive. The only question is: are you willing to do the work? 

Get in touchto learn how we can help you maximise your HubSpot investment!